alt.engineering.electrical

In article ,
RUBored@ says...
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:31:11 -0400, krw wrote:
>
> >In article ,
> >RUBored@ says...
> >> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 14:17:18 -0400, krw wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article , unclemonhatespam@
> >> >says...
> >> >> Jean wrote:
> >> >> > The problem of the electrical cars' range can be solved if we install
> >> >> > terminals of recharging everywhere, including on the aeries of
> >> >> > freeways. Since the complete recharging takes several hours, it is
> >> >> > possible to reduce it by equipping every battery of an independent
> >> >> > male electrical plugs, and every demarcation of recharging of so much
> >> >> > female plugs. So the time of recharging of n batteries will take so
> >> >> > much time as the recharging of one of them.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Declassify the documents seized by the government
> >> >> after Tesla's death and utilize his power broadcast
> >> >> technology.
> >> >
> >> >Umm, you're in the wrong group. This is
> >> >not .
> >>
> >>
> >> You're both idiots. They are already doing exactly that.
> >
> >Doing exactly what, Dimbulb? There is more than one subject here.
>
> No. The subject of the post I responded to was about Tesla, and power
> transmission through the air, idiot.

You write as poorly as you think. It's not easy figuring out what
you're saying, Dimmie.

> >> Try the last couple months of Popular mechanics.
> >
> >I don't read fiction.
>
> It isn't fiction, you fucking retard. It is being done at MIT. YOU
> are fictitious, however.

Popular Mechanics *IS* fiction.

> > Remember the flying ion-propelled cars?
>
> No, George, I don't. But you can go outside and take Ras Roh for a
> walk on the belt, and get flipped off.

You have a short memory to go with your single-digit IQ.

> > That
> >was in Popular Mechanics too.
>
> You're an idiot.

From you, that's quite a compliment.

> > You're an idiot, Dimmie.
>
> No... I'm a realist.

No, and idiot.

> >> Not that I would want to be proximal to such an animal, but they ARE
> >> doing it, and they are doing it without the sparks that his system
> >> exhibited.
> >
> >Dumb Dimmie.
>
> Nice sig. You should stick with it. It fits you to a tee.

My sig is my first name, Dimbulb. I wouldn't expect you to recognize
a signature though. It would take more than one neuron.

--
Keith