alt.engineering.electrical

"Don Kelly" wrote in message
news: $ @pd7urf1no...
> "Anonymous." wrote in message
> news:fahqgi$sp3$1@ ...
>> In message which was
>> published in these
>> newsgroups on 13 Dec 2003, the following is asserted.....
>> "The term e^(-jwt) isn't some magical time machine relating to
>> "minus
>> time", e^(-jwt) is simply another way of writing 1/(e^jwt)
>> which
>> is a value that decreases as t increasing. "
>> Surely this is quite wrong?
>> Surely e^(-jwt) is a cyclic phenomenon, the value, or modulus, of
>> which remains absolutely constant and of the value unity?
> It is wrong in the interpretation which appears to be based on real
> numbers. You have it right but in light of your reaction to Salmon Egg's
> comments, it seems that you really don't know why.

Thank-you for your input, Don, but unfortunately you also have fallen from
the reaction
of my stalker, Nathan Hull, G7KUJ who posts as
"+7IiMjEePDrUlHMcutxEQw.user. ", and who adopted the pseudonym
of "Anonymous" immediately after I changed to Anonymous.

He has also posted recently as...

Ne Plus Ultra, (Adopted immediately after me)
ne plus givre,
Lazy-Arsed Class A,
Gareth Tesla Evans, nee G8DXY,
pope benedict,
fr neil evans,
WPC Pullman,
Cool For Twats,
Beanie Simon,
Hypocrite,
Evans is a Lying Useless Sack of Shit,
Big K,
"Gugliemo Sponger Evans",
The G3VKI4KFK7KUJ Triumvirate of Mediocrity,
Counsellor for Comportment,
Dictator of Dogma,
Anonymous (Adopted immediately after me)


(Despite that I am gareth evans and my brother Fr. Neil Evans, but from
those two pseudonyms alone plus the abusive references to me you can
see that he is one sick, sick kiddie)

I post as "Z3IpgFh83JnnDIiU15n1gQ.user. "